“This election was a wakeup call.”

As an American, I have experienced a plethora of emotions since Election Day. As a Democrat, I have felt disappointed. As a woman and a feminist, I have felt disrespected. As a believer in equal rights for LGBTQA individuals, I have felt disheartened. As an advocate for racial equality, I have felt insulted. As a descendent of immigrants, like most Americans, I have felt anger. As a passionate environmentalist, I have undeniably felt distraught. As a future healthcare professional, who believes that healthcare is not a privilege, I have felt severe anxiety.

After all of those negative emotions I now feel a sense of purpose—a sense that now more than ever I will need to keep being an advocate for equal rights, I will need to keep being an advocate for the environment. All of this, for the next four years in particular.

Last weekend, my boss and I canvassed for Hillary in a conservative part of town. We only knocked on the doors of registered Democrats, but we still encountered hatred from a Trump supporter that I will never forget. I was walking down the street with my clipboard in hand, and a Hillary sticker on my shirt when a red pickup truck pulled up next to me. The man shouted through his window “We are for Trump in this neighbourhood”. I kept walking and didn’t make eye contact as I did not want to encourage his antagonising – a skill I have learned as a result of being a female in a misogynistic culture. He then drove towards my boss, an African American woman, and proceeded to be much harsher in addressing her, threatening to call the police on us and yelling at her to “get out.” I would like to believe that a lot of Trump supporters would not act in this way, but we cannot deny that his rhetoric has made this behavior seem more acceptable. I am certain that, although I wasn’t treated kindly, I was treated better because of my skin color, and I hope that this incident is not indicative of the culture during a Trump presidency.

This election was a wakeup call. It has highlighted the sharp divide within our country that has the potential to separate us completely if we are not careful. I am ashamed that my own party’s leadership sabotaged Bernie Sanders, a candidate loved by the masses and instead nominated a candidate that is seen as untrustworthy by people of all political affiliations. However, it is not productive to place blame. Instead, we must learn from our mistakes and improve our political system so that the majority of Americans never feel as underrepresented as they do right now. We need to have more comprehensive involvement in our elections, especially local and midterm elections, as that is where change, if any, can occur.

Lastly, we need to have more open discussions between individuals, preferably not in a Facebook comments section. I am so tired of high tension arguments between those with opposing viewpoints, as this does not represent a productive method of political discourse.

It is normal for the “losing” party to require time to mourn its election loss, so now is the time to heal and regroup. Nevertheless, it is imperative for all Americans to remain cognisant of what is happening, both in the world and in our own nation in the upcoming years. Now, more than ever, we must expose and fight injustice on microscopic and macroscopic levels.  As Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. said, “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”

Looking forward, we need to continue being industrious, optimistic, and resilient. Americans, at the end of the day, are united in our love of freedom, even though that term’s meaning varies amongst us. That is the beauty of America—we are a wondrous compilation of cultures, religions, languages, ethnicities, beliefs, etc. In the next four years let us cherish our differences and empower each other. We are stronger than we think.

– Emma Griffith

P.S. Climate change is real.

“We will never have a perfect world, but it’s not romantic or naive to work toward a better one.” – Quote on a Chipotle bag

Is Ignorance the Root of Today’s Problems?

I’d be lying if I didn’t think our world was crumbling apart. Every morning we wake up to news notifications telling us about a shooting, a stabbing or a suicide bombing. We wake up to diplomats giving their condolences to allies worldwide. We hear and watch the vigils set up by citizens who want to give back to those who have lost their lives and offer support to the families who have to live with the tragedy. Each day we are hearing about the deaths of innocent people who are targeted because of fuelled hatred. We live in a world where hatred is ruling over us and we’re currently letting that get the best of our society.

All these events work in conjunction to polarize the global community. But if we let that divide the world then we limit the extent of knowledge citizens can have about everything and everyone that surrounds them. And without knowledge we are nothing but vulnerable.

In this article I’d like to tackle a few of the concerns that have risen from all these events, which in my opinion are the driving points for polarisation. To a few people this may seem absurd, but I’m only asking for a place to display my thoughts on our world’s biggest misconceptions.

Number 1: Muslims are not terrorists.

Islam is not a religion built around killing others of other religions. I have lived in a Muslim country for half of my life, and being a catholic person, I will reassure you that I have never been treated with disrespect nor have I at any time felt threatened by them.

Islam is not some sort of alien, malicious religion. Muslim individuals are like any other individual- their headscarves do not make them any different than any of us. In fact, we must keep in mind that the mass worshippers of a religion cannot be blamed for the actions of selected individuals, especially individuals that are mentally unstable. Terrorism isn’t a Muslim thing; lunatics are everywhere.

Number 2: Terrorists = Radicalism.

The so called IS (Islamic State) is not a random group of Muslims who have decided to stand up for the entire Muslim community and attack others who they feel threaten their religion. This is a misconception of caused by those who only use the media as a reliable source for personal judgments.

This terrorist group, just like any other, completely twists what a religion is based on. The words by which it guides are changed so that a completely different meaning is conveyed so they can use it as a basis for their malice.

Terrorists are just like any group of bullies we all have come across in school. They pick on a particular point and hold on to it so they can use it against other innocent people, just for personal advancement; in IS’s case, world dominance. But we can never forget that how bullies treat their victims is a production of a twisted, cruel mind.

Number 3: Immigrants are not the cause of your problems.

The majority of migrants want a degree so they are able to find a job, raise money and support their families. They are willing to work hours and hours to get a decent salary just so they have something to repatriate back into their own, poorer home countries. It helps to keep in mind that many of these individuals tend to become highly qualified and dedicated persons. Think of the biggest inventions in the US to the UK: they have come from very talented migrants whose inspiration has stemmed from an urge to succeed, wherever they have been given the opportunity to.

I am a Venezuelan migrant in the UK and the UAE, I have been a migrant in Singapore and I will be that in the Netherlands, all because I strive to be internationally educated so I can have more opportunities. I’d like to clarify that people don’t migrate to developed countries to plot their next attack against Westerners; immigrants are solely looking for a better tomorrow. We all go to educate ourselves in places where we know the education is of better quality, not because we want to take-over schools and destroy the system. This is a massive misconception and a very grand discriminatory perspective of the international community, especially the Muslim community.

And additionally, we must not forget that thanks to these immigrants, developed economies have larger workforces, greater innovation, more productive labor and most importantly, that it opens up the minds of individuals and helps people understand diversity. This last point, is what glues societies all together.

Number 4: #BlackLivesMatter

I am white, but I am Latino. And I’d be ignorant to say Latinos were not largely discriminated against in the US. But the most persistent issue even in the 21^st century, is that black people are seen as a threat and ultimately it’s a truly despicable way of seeing a race. This view has been embedded in the minds of several citizens because racism has been built in the minds of many white individuals. White supremacy, as I always say, has always been around and there is no justification for such perception.

Black people are not any less important than white people, they are as equally smart, valuable and worthy. No, they are not dirty, revengeful people- they are perfectly normal and beautiful just like any other individual in this world. But many seem to be oblivious to that.

The years of oppression were never over, black people have had to abide by the rules of white people so they could live in less fear. Racist view points are still persistent in our societies, the only difference being that people don’t want to be called out on it as they care way too much about their reputations. But the underlying racist thoughts still remain, and until we change those thoughts they will continue to be destructive.

I have made my 4 claims, but now I’d like to convey my own view of the overall picture.

We live in the 21^st century, and those that have been oppressed, be it because of racism, religion, gender, sexual orientation or heritage, are sick of living suppressed lives for all these years. Just like any other person, we all have the right to have our rights respected- and oppressed communities are sick of having theirs taken away.

People need to stop calling others out for speaking their minds, because freedom for an individual stems from having freedom of speech; you wouldn’t like to have your opinion ignored, so why should any other have theirs?  And that I believe is the main issue: as many of us are beginning to partake in protests and become activists about issues that concern us, some individuals respond to it with walls, physically and metaphorically.

The issue with walls is that they don’t solve problems, they only hide them; we cannot expect to go back to an un-globalised world because cultures have mixed, people have travelled and we have opened our minds. Society can’t expect to be better off if we divide; because once we divide we are a less powerful force.

Radicalism only sucks in those who are in vulnerable positions, not those who have a more accepting view of the world’s reality. If we educate people enough about differences in culture, traditions and religions, think of what our world could be instead.

We can say our society is falling apart at the moment, but it doesn’t mean that we can’t change what has occurred or can occur. The world has to unite to fight the larger forces. It is only by uniting that our societies and communities can fight radicalism and groups who are guided by hatred, so that we can live in a world where we don’t feel threatened, but rather accepted.

By Astrid Sofia Flores Maya

Feature: A Patriot’s view of Brexit

The night before Britain headed to the polls in potentially the most infamous referendum of our time, I tweeted an aggressively pro-remain message to the world which gained over 10,000 interactions. The popularity of such a tweet left me bubbling with confidence; not only had I achieved Twitter-famous status for a couple of hours, but the countless retweets and likes left me thinking that there were thousands of others who shared a similar opinion.

Even despite my best efforts to avoid the news on Friday 24th June such that it would not distract me from my Further Maths exam that same morning, I was awoken by the legendary BBC News headline chime resonating from my phone, explaining that the British people had decided by the thinnest of margins that the country would be better off outside of the European Union. I’ll skip the jibber-jabber; I was angry, and the adverse economic effects of Brexit immediately came into light. But I am not here to repeat stone-cold facts, nor am I here to express my disappointment.  I am simply here to explain my top three most important things to note in light of the biggest decision of our generation.

The media must stop throwing all pro-Brexit supporters under the same bus. After the vote concluded, most of the pro-remain crowd resorted to blaming the disillusioned elderly, claiming that it was their ‘old-fashioned’, xenophobic views which led them to vote to, as Floundering Farage or Jocular Johnson would say, ‘take our country back’, a phrase frighteningly easy to confuse with the baffoon across the pond’s slogan, ‘make America great again’. While it may be true that number of Brexiteers increased as the age increased, it is important not to label them all under the same umbrella.

Wales, for example, is an example of a country which decided as a whole that Brexit was the best option; and while it may be true that many voted out of fear of immigrants and the rise in Islamic terrorism, entirely ignoring the advice of security chiefs of GCHQ, MI6 and MI5, there remained many Welsh men and women who placed their vote to leave simply as a protest against the higher powers in Westminster and Brussels pretending to allow the Welsh Government freedom yet seemingly overshadowing them and dictating their every move. Despite the country receiving such a heavy amount of EU funding, there were still those, especially on the farms and in the countryside, who believed that they had never seen a single penny of this ‘beneficial’ EU funding, despite being members of the taxpaying crowdfunding the money our Government sends over to Brussels.

Furthermore, the elderly are more aware of life before the EU in the United Kingdom, and it is probably safe to say that entering the EU in the first place was not a particularly wise decision for the country, given that I am yet to speak to anyone who believes that this is the case. For those who can remember the country beforehand, a country they thought was ‘better’, ‘stronger’ and more ‘independent’, it seems obvious that the choice would be to get the hell out of the EU and return to the ‘independent’ nation we used to be. Perhaps this was a very gullible approach to take given how much the economic climate of the world has changed since we joined, but nevertheless, it goes to show that while the vast majority of Brexiteers voted out of fear of the people who may be coming into the country, it is unfair to drag others of different opinions under the same ‘xenophobe’ label. In fact, as a whole, I believe that Brexit has shown how much fear is harvested in the British people. Be it for political, personal or logical reasons, the number of people voting to leave the EU just came to show how unhappy the British people are with the current system.

Secondly, as the vote crept closer and closer, the arguments being made on either side of the public became more and more about immigrants and terrorism and open borders etc. rather than focusing on the effects which I believe are actually relevant; trade, the economy and funding for new projects and buildings in the country. Whilst the free trade movement does involve free movement of EU residents into the country, I personally feel as though the EU argument should always have been based on the economy and trade. Despite its occasionally ludicrous laws and sanctions, the free trade movement has evolved into being one of the most vital components of business in our country, and to see it cease would, in my opinion, cause a great deal of hassle for businesses who use it frequently and put a strain on those who have been using the movement to import and export products, who will, if we do eventually trigger Article 50, have to deal with much more paperwork and fees with which they are not accustomed to dealing with.

Moreover, for those wishing to have rid of the free trade movement because of the free movement of workers involved, if the UK is to continue being a strong economic power then a future deal with the countries of the EU and maybe even the EU itself will have to be struck regardless, which heavily implies that the free movement of workers will have to be negotiated in the future either way. In my humble opinion, it seems unintelligible to think that the UK could possess the power to pick and choose what they want and don’t want from trade deals, and even more unintelligible to think that we will be able to negotiate future trade deals with the EU without giving any leeway for the movement of its workers into the country. Thus, my second note on so-called Brexit would be a resolution that must be made for the future; let’s focus on the economy from now on rather than continuing the argument over immigration, an issue which from my perspective is completely negligible.

Speaking of ‘if we do eventually trigger Article 50’, my third note is that despite the fact that the referendum is now over a month gone, I wouldn’t expect to hear the conversations about it faltering any time soon. Considering the fact that as of yet we have managed to change Prime Minister without negotiating a date for triggering the Article, it seems uncertain if and when Brexit talks will go ahead, even with Theresa May insisting that ‘Brexit means Brexit’. Moreover, with parliament holding a debate on 5th September to discuss the possibility of a second referendum supported by over four million petition-signers, only God knows when on earth the whole ordeal will come to an end. Certainly not soon, by any means. The ‘two years’ between triggering Article 50 and actually leaving the EU that vote remain supporters used to calm themselves down after the votes were counted hasn’t even begun yet, and with Theresa May looking determined to get her role in Office off to a superb start, who knows when she will even consider running the risk of finally triggering Article 50.

This is not the end, and with Brexit leading to the most right-wing cabinet of my time being put in charge of the country I adore so much, I can see signs of a changing Britain over the horizon. A fearful Britain scared of interacting with the rest of the world whose largest companies are considering emptying their headquarters and shifting them over to some other country who may not gamble with their profits so much. In such a time of personal faith loss in the people I have come to call my own, I can only remain optimistic and hope for a better future. By the words of the old man Churchill; “A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.”

By Jordan Edwards